Reviewer Guide

REVIEWER GUIDELINES

SITEKNIK: Sistem Informasi, Teknik dan Teknologi Terapan

Peer reviewers are responsible for evaluating manuscripts based on their expertise, providing constructive feedback, and ensuring the authenticity and quality of the research. Reviewers discuss strengths, weaknesses, and provide suggestions to increase the paper's impact.

I. Pre-Review Checklist

Expertise Match: Does the manuscript align with your field? If not, notify the editor and suggest an alternative.
Time Commitment: Can you complete the review within two weeks?
Conflict of Interest: Disclose any potential conflicts to the editor before proceeding.

II. Evaluation Criteria

General Elements

Title: Clearly illustrates the study.
Abstract: Reflects core contents.
Introduction: State of the problem & context.
Originality: Plagiarism must be under 20%.

Methodology & Results

Method: Accurate data collection & theory.
Results: Logical sequence & statistical tools.
Conclusion: Supported by results & comparison.
Visuals: Easy to interpret tables/images.

III. Writing Style & Scope

Manuscripts must be written in Coherent English and adhere to journal standards. We prioritize:

Applied Perspectives: Innovation in systems, processes, and tools across Information Systems, Engineering, and sustainable technology (including case studies and practice-based research).

IV. Final Recommendation & Ethics

Confidentiality: Review results are private. Do not contact authors directly.

Plagiarism/Fraud: Notify the editor immediately if you suspect data fabrication or ethical issues.

Feedback: Please distinguish between comments intended for the Editor and those for the Author.